Independent Clinical Evaluation

DOT Glasses Evaluation

Independent Kenyan evaluation comparing simplified eyewear fitting (Dot Glasses) to standard full refraction. Partners: GDI Hub and UCL. Senses Hub role: strictly independent evaluation - no distribution involvement.

Kenya Field Evaluation GDI Hub + UCL Collaboration No Distribution Involvement

DOT Glasses participant during independent visual acuity evaluation

Method-first Compared with full refraction baseline.

Independent role Senses Hub handles evaluation only.

Project Overview

Independent Kenyan evaluation comparing simplified eyewear fitting (Dot Glasses) to standard full refraction. Partners: GDI Hub and UCL.

Senses Hub role: strictly independent evaluation - no distribution involvement.

Partners

GDI Hub (UCL) · UCL

Independent evaluator: Senses Hub

Field Gallery

Documentation from the independent Kenyan evaluation process.

Evaluator supporting participant during DOT Glasses fitting session — Fitting session observed by the independent evaluation team.

Participant undergoing visual screening in a Kenyan field setting — Visual screening in a Kenyan field context.

Data collection team recording outcomes from DOT Glasses comparison trial — Outcome logging during comparison with full refraction.

Close-up of DOT Glasses adjustment process for participant comfort — Adjustment process documented as part of usability evaluation.

Independent evaluator team discussing observation notes and quality checks — Independent team review of observations and quality checks.

Methodology and Independence

Rigorous evidence-based protocol with a clear statement on Senses Hub's independent role. There is no commercial interest in distribution outcomes.

Comparison against standard full refraction
Structured field protocol and quality controls
Ethics approval and participant consent documentation

Findings and Publications

Outputs from this evaluation feed evidence for accessibility-focused vision pathways and future policy guidance.